GCNS vs. MCON ETF Comparison

Comparison of Ishares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF (GCNS) to Mackenzie Conservative Allocation CAD ETF (MCON)
GCNS

Ishares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF

GCNS Description

GCNS seeks to provide income and long-term capital growth by investing primarily in one or more iSharesETFs that provide exposure to fixed income and/or equity securities. The iShares ETFs in which GCNS investsgenerally employ ESG-oriented investment strategies or primarily invest in government bonds. See ?InvestmentObjectives?.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$41.49

Average Daily Volume

707

Number of Holdings *

2

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
MCON

Mackenzie Conservative Allocation CAD ETF

MCON Description Mackenzie Conservative Allocation ETF seeks to provide a combination of income and moderate long-term capital growth, primarily by investing in ETFs that provide exposure to a portfolio of global equity and fixed income securities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$20.63

Average Daily Volume

1,347

Number of Holdings *

6

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period GCNS MCON
30 Days 0.26% -1.39%
60 Days 0.94% -0.72%
90 Days 1.91% 3.56%
12 Months 7.47% 4.46%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in GCNS Weight in MCON Overlap
GCNS Overweight 2 Positions Relative to MCON
Symbol Grade Weight
CLF B 17.38%
CLG B 8.7%
GCNS Underweight 6 Positions Relative to MCON
Symbol Grade Weight
QBB C -33.4%
QUU A -20.69%
QCN A -12.54%
QDX A -7.57%
QEE A -2.72%
QEBL F -0.99%
Compare ETFs